APU Students Participate in Economic Talk

APU Students Participate in G4 “Economic Talk” Symposium in Tokyo:
2010/5/6 10:46:47 (1283 reads)

n March 22-27, 2010, three APU international students participated in the Iuventum G4 Economic Talk symposium in Tokyo. APU Students Arisyi Fariza Raz (APM4, Indonesia), Tamarind Puri Khiranti Indra (APM4, Indonesia) and Iqra Anugrah (APS3, Indonesia) participated in the 6 day program and discussed a range of global issues and from the youth perspective with other students from universities in the G4 nations of China, Japan, the USA and Germany.

Dealing with various economic-related topics, such as globalization, regionalism and health issues, the APU students showed their skills in the panel discussion sessions, working alongside other participants from prestigious universities around Japan and abroad such as Tokyo University and Waseda University.

During the conference, the participants also had the opportunity to hear from representatives of the automobile industry including Toyota and Volkswagen who spoke of their efforts to reduce Co2 emissions and the introduction of environmentally friendly technology in response to global warming. At the end of the conference, a joint communiqué was presented by the participants and included policy recommendations for predicted challenges in the year 2020.

Looking back on the talks, Iqra Anugrah (APS3, Indonesia) commented, “The conference was so exciting and I learnt many new things. I particularly enjoyed discussing and exchanging ideas on recent global economic issues with so many students from many of the outstanding universities in Japan.”

Supporters of this event include the G8 Youth Summit Japan, the German-Japanese Youth Society and the United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.

Reporter, Student Press Assistant (SPA): Raz Arisyi Fariza (APM3, Indonesia)

Editorial: Moving Ahead with The APU Times

The APU Times has enthused leap and bounds within the span of three years of short history. Established in 2007 by a few visionary who advocated for the right to information of students, it established itself as a true university newspaper. Despite the economic and human resources problems, it rose to become one of the top rated non premiere organizations of APU.

This was a time of ‘trial and error’ in the management of the circle. From its infantry, it strived to provide the best for the students and University alike. It came up with unique ideas like exchanges with other university newspapers, organizing workshops and did some experiments with the contents. Now, we feel a sense of glory to be where we are. Thanks to the ever increasing love and comments from our valued readers, the APU Times is only more committed to give more to its readers and working for the betterment of APU either by highlighting its achievements or bringing forth the issues which must be addressed properly.

It is not only the APU Times that is involved in this process. Various student organizations like circles, different assistants like LA, TA, SA, RA, and SPA among others strive continually to ease the student’s life in APU. In this process, the ‘noise-makers’ (the executive committee of the APU Times, as it is popularly called) has decided to value the contribution given by these organizations and dedicate some of its limited space to inform the students about their activities and messages.

The APU Times would like to take this opportunity to cooperate with all the other institutions which share the common aim of creating a better APU. It would also like to request all those organizations to promote their activities through the newspapers which is widely read among the students, while at the same time, help students get information with ease. The APU Times is eagerly looking forward for warm hands.

With this, The APU Times wishes everybody a very prosperous and meaningful 2010 and appeals all the organizations for close cooperation. The new dawn begins. The earlier we wake up, the more sunlight we can have.

*By Iqra Anugrah, Editor-in-Chief of The APU Times, Published 21 January 2010 http://aputimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=198:editorial.-moving-ahead-with-the-apu-times&catid=9:circles&Itemid=14&lang=en

Exclusive Interview with Former President of APU, Prof. Monte Cassim

As a part of the change in the executive postings of the Ritsumeikan Trust, Professor Monte Cassim will end his tenure as the President of APU. This time, The APU Times had an opportunity to know more about his experience, ideas and opinions on the development in Asia Pacific.

First of all, can you tell briefly about yourself and your career history?

Initially I enrolled in the course of natural science with focus on physics and chemistry. At that time, the new department of architecture was opened. I was attracted to architecture because it combines various aspects from science, engineering and arts. So I decided to study architecture. Upon graduation, I decided to work as an architect.

Why you decided to go to Japan? What is the most interesting thing about Japan for you?

At first, I went to Japan for graduate study. However, I realized that I learned more by observing the surrounding situation outside the classroom. I started to fall in love with Japanese industries. The most important question for me was why everywhere you go in Japan you can find lots of small industries that they can proud of? Then I started to learn more about Japan’s industrial history, process and technology in relation to its rapid development.

And after that?

I began to work for a frontline think-tank in Japan. The unique thing about it was its ‘hybrid’ team of young foreign scholars and Japanese professionals under the lead of professors. Our work was to find some particular regions and research how those regions grow. The result of this will be applied to other regions especially in developing areas. In other words, our task was to search for industrial development model for Asia. That was why we chose rural areas because it would be more ideal for developing countries. It was in 1970s, and what we did was thinking about what Asia will be in 1990s.

That must be really fascinating! So you continued to work on that field?

Because I was interested to work immediately after finishing my study, I quitted the job. I took up teaching position in Penang, Malaysia for one year. After that, I continued my study to PhD in Japan level and worked for Mitsui Corporation for another two years. Actually it was difficult to me to move around for working and I was kind of reluctant to move again for another job. Besides, I already had family at that time and I had to take care of my children. Nevertheless, various opportunities kept coming to me. A head of UN organization in Tokyo offered me another job. After a long time of contemplating, I agreed to take that job and work for 10 years in the field of urban development, housing and industrial development. I conducted strategic assistant programs in Indonesia, Latin America and Africa.

Hearing your rich and diverse experience will surely motivate every one of us. Having experienced various kinds of responsibilities, what is the most important learning point for you?

Looking back to my experience, especially during my time as a researcher, I was really impressed by the enabling learning environment. It was a rare opportunity to have variety of people with different backgrounds, nationalities and field of studies to think and work together and do something meaningful. This experience is the reason why I am interested in education. This is why I received another chance from the Ritsumeikan Trust to teach at Ritsumeikan University.

How long have you been working with the Ritsumeikan Trust and APU? What did you do during that time?

I worked at Ritsumeikan for six years and developed Ritsumeikan International Division and Discovery Research Laboratory. My work mainly focused on health and environmental science. During my time we transformed the international division into one of the biggest administrative unit, and I also dealt with the development of human and environmentally friendly technology in the laboratory.

Then, I took up the position of president at APU for six years term. Of course I did few mistakes, but I really learned many things from this experience.

As a former president of APU, what is one of the most remarkable achievements of our university from your perspective?

We allocate 64% of our budget for education, research and scholarship, and now we are the number nine private university in Japan in terms of financial health.

What is your advice for our university students and community?

The sky is the limit. Dream and dare to do what you dream of!

*By Iqra Anugrah. Published in The APU Times 21 January 2010 http://aputimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=197:exclusive-interview-with-former-president-of-apu,-prof.-monte-cassim&catid=1:academic-news&Itemid=187&lang=en

Commemorating the Fall of Berlin Wall: a Tribute to Humanity

Commemorating the fall of Berlin Wall: a Tribute to Humanity

By Iqra Anugrah, APS3

In the middle of 20th century, world witnessed the end of the Second World War. This catastrophe of civilization, however, did not end at that point. The winners of the war, namely the Western bloc led by the US and the Communist bloc led by the USSR, started to dismantle the power of the loser, Germany. The West initially proposed liberal democracy and market economy as a model for the newly reconstructed Germany, something that the USSR rejected. As a consequence of this policy, the Soviet Union initiated the declaration of Soviet-style republic in the Eastern part of Germany, to challenge the existence of West Germany. The construction of the Berlin Wall later started in 1961, in order to prevent emigration from the East and Western influence in Soviet-occupied areas.

Twenty years ago, in 1989, no one would imagine how the Berlin Wall could fall. At that time, socialism was tried to be implemented in East Germany. In the so-called Democratic Republic, the state provided everything. East Germany guaranteed free healthcare for everyone, free education until university level and the participation level of women in politics. Those things looked like an earthly heaven, but what went wrong?

In this “People’s Republic”, people could not elect their own leaders. Some party bureaucrats from the undemocratic Socialist Unity Party, SED, claimed to represent them. They also could not travel freely to foreign countries, especially those countries which were labeled as “capitalist”.

In Leipzig, twenty years ago, people started to gather at the historical St. Nicholas’ Church. At that time, it was prohibited for East German citizens to gather for political activities. The only thing the East German authority did not know was that Church was the only place for people to voice their aspirations.  People came and as the time goes by, more and more people attended the service. Slowly but sure, the voice of struggle started to reach out.

When the authority heard the news, they were not happy about it at all. They tried to arreste some people. But the spirit never dies and the movement still kept on going. Every Monday, after the regular prayer, people gathered for the demonstrations. The Montagsdemo, Monday demonstration began with few people, until 70,000 out of 500,000 citizens of Leipzig came to the street, driven by their consciousness and made the demonstrations noted as one of the most peaceful revolutions in the world. People were holding candles, a symbol of resistance and non-violence. Facing fully-armed security forces, the demonstrators shouted the most powerful chant, Wir sind das Volk!-“We are the people”, a statement for people’s sovereignty. They challenged the legitimacy of the authoritarian GDR regime and asked for more openness and freedom in the country.

The demonstrations spread to many other places as well, including Berlin. Series of peaceful demonstrations finally led to the fall of the Berlin Wall on 9 November 1989 and the fall of East German socialist state, which later triggered the fall of communist bloc in Europe.

Twenty years later a lot of people gathered again at St. Nicholas’ Church, prepared for another demonstration. In the past, people united for fight against the authoritarian nature of the communist rule. Now they unite again, struggling against the injustice of social security cuts, market fundamentalism and war, as a tribute of humanity.

*Published at The APU Times, November 2009

Merayakan Kemerdekaan

*Post ini pernah dimuat di account facebook Saya, di sini

Hari ini adalah suatu momentum yang besar bagi sebuah bangsa bernama Indonesia. Genap sudah 63 tahun kemerdekaan kita, yang dirayakan dimana-mana, di seluruh nusantara dan juga jagad raya, dan oleh siapa saja, baik si tukang becak Mas Parmin, si supir bus Bang Tigor, bos-bos perusahaan, dan tentu saja, berbagai macam “orang biasa”, mengutip istilah Wimar Witoelar.

Saya rasa pertanyaan klasik, namun juga mendasar, bagi kita sebagai sebuah bangsa adalah “Apa itu kemerdekaan ?” dan “Bagaimana kita mengisi kemerdekaan ?”

Berbagai pemikir dan pemimpin dari berbagai bangsa pernah berpikir mengenai hal ini, dan berusaha menjawabnya, termasuk para pendiri dan pemimpin bangsa kita.

Di Eropa sosok Hitler dan Nazi di Jerman, serta di Russia yang diwakili oleh Lenin, Stalin, dan Partai Komunis, pernah suatu ketika merumuskan kemerdekaan sebagai “kemenangan bangsa Arya”, “kemurnian ras Arya”, “masyarakat tanpa klas”, “diktator proletariat”, dan berbagai konsepsi lainnya yang sejenis.

Hasilnya ? Katastrofi. Bencana kemanusiaan. Ratusan ribu bahkan jutaan anak manusia terbunuh tanpa alasan yang jelas, demi slogan “kemerdekaan” dibawah panji-panji “sosialisme” dan “nasionalisme”

Bangsa kita pernah mengalami sejarah kelam seperti itu, meskipun dalam skala yang lebih kecil, masa-masa di mana “kemerdekaan” menjadi sebuah alat untuk menindas kemanusiaan dan kita sebagai manusia.

Soekarno sang Proklamator pernah merumuskan kemerdekaan sebagai “demokrasi terpimpin” dan “Manipol Usdek”sebagai cara untuk merayakannya, sedangkan Soeharto merumuskannya sebagai “Orde Baru” dan menawarkan “Pembangunan” untuk merayakannya.

Dan seperti kita semua tahu, banyak nyawa hilang untuk menebus hal-hal tersebut, konsepsi-konsepsi tentang suatu bangsa yang “bebas”-murni dari berbagai pengaruh “luar”, dan kewajiban untuk mengisinya dengan “pembangunan”

Konsepsi-konsepsi yang seringkali kita tidak tahu apa maknanya, yang memaksa merumuskan “kita” sebagai sebuah kesempurnaan, dan karenanya, mengutip Goenawan Mohammad, “membekukan kemungkinan-kemungkinan yang berbeda dari diri manusia”

Dan kita semua tahu sejarah telah membuktikan, bahwasanya, ide-ide yang berangkat dari utopia-utopia seperti itu akan berakibat fatal bagi kemanusiaan.

Beruntunglah sejarah kita masih dipenuhi oleh orang-orang yang sadar akan bahaya utopia-utopia itu, orang-orang yang menyadari bahwa yang utama, dan terutama, adalah kemanusiaan.

Salah satu dari banyak hal yang sudah dan sering kita lupakan adalah, manusia bukanlah suatu konsepsi mengenai kesempurnaan, sebab Tuhan yang transedental tidaklah menciptakan manusia sebagai sebuah sosok yang sempurna, itulah mengapa Dia menciptakan manusia dengan nafsu, sebagai pertanda kedaifan, dan kecacatan yang niscaya

Namun demikian, kita juga diciptakan dengan segenap potensi dan kemampuan, dan karena itu, kemanusiaan menjadi hal yang sangat penting. Melihat manusia tentulah harus dengan dua pandangan: optimistik dan pesimistik.

Dan saya pikir, hanya dengan melihat manusia seperti itu, dan menghargai sisi-sisi manusiawi dan kemanusiaan dari manusia, kita bisa menggapai kemerdekaan. Kemudian berpijak dari pandangan inilah, selayaknya kita merumuskan masa depan kita.

Itulah mengapa Hatta mencoba berpikir jauh ke depan, mencoba mewujudkan “utopia”nya, dengan cara-cara yang realistis, dan karena itulah, dia memilih demokrasi sebagai cara untuk mencapai cita-citanya. Dan kita semua tahu bahwasanya sepanjang hidupnya, Hatta dalah seorang demokrat sejati.

Dan Tan Malaka-seorang Marxis kawakan yang tidak dogmatis-berusaha mengubah cara berpikir bangsa ini, dengan aktivisme dan intelektualismenya yang damai, melalui berbagai karyanya seperti Madilog.

Seringkali kita berpikir, mungkinkah hal itu terwujud ? Apakah usaha melawan utopia bukanlah berarti utopia itu sendiri ?

Yang pasti, untuk mewujudkan “utopia kemanusiaan”-kalau boleh saya menyebutnya demikian, seringkali diperlukan pengorbanan yang besar, seperti yang almarhum Munir lakukan.

Tapi yakinlah, bahwa budi kemanusiaan yang mendasari kemerdekaan kita bukanlah sesuatu yang tidak mungkin. Orangh-orang seperti Gandhi membuktikan bahwasanya kemerdekaan adalah pembebasan bagi kemanusiaan.

Dan seringkali kita mendapati, tokoh-tokoh yang menjadi panutan kita untuk menggapai kebebasan terkadang “berkhianat” melawan prinsipnya sendiri. Oleh karena itu Chosmky mengingatkan “yang perlu kita cari bukanlah sosok yang ideal, melainkan gagasan yang sempurna”

Oleh karena itu, dalam rangka merayakan kemerdekaan, marilah kita resapi dalam diri kita semua, merayakan kemerdekaan adalah membela kebebasan, suatu hal di mana manusia bebas dari tekanan dan ancaman di luar dirinya. Merayakan kemerdekaan adalah menjaga kemanusiaan, mengakui bahwasanya manusia bukannya makhluk yang sempurna, namun memiliki potensi untuk berkembang, dan berusaha menjaga itu. Merayakan kemerdekaan berarti anti-utopianisme, berlawan terhadap ide-ide yang tidak menghargai kemanusiaan, dan mengancam kebebasan.

Seraya merayakan kemerdekaan, mari kita berusaha dan berdoa agar Indonesia menjadi negara yang sekali merdeka tetap merdeka, menghargai kebebasan. Semoga Indonesia konsisten di relnya sebagai negara demokratis, semoga Indonesia menjadi bangsa yang religius sekaligus menghargai kebebasan agama dan kebebasan berpikir, semoga sejarah kelam utopianisme semu tentang “masyarakat yang sempurna” tidak pernah terulang lagi kelak di bumi Indonesia, dan di dunia ini.

Merayakan Kemerdekaan, Melawan Utopianisme, Menghargai Kemanusiaan, Membela Kebebasan !

Dirgahayu Republik Indonesia !